Yucesoy

Yucesoy v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
109 F. Supp. 3d 1259·2015 WL 3657656·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76617
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 2015No. C-15-0262 EMCCalifornia6,988 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chen, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Hakan Yucesoy and Abdi Ma-hammed drove for Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc., in Massachusetts between 2012 and 2014. See Docket No. 27 (First Amended Complaint) (FAC) at ¶¶ 5-6. In June 2014, Plaintiffs filed this putative class action lawsuit in Massachusetts Superior Court, alleging that Uber and individual defendants Travis Kalanick and Ryan Graves 1 violated numerous provisions of Massachusetts law, including misclassifying drivers as independent contractors and failing to remit gratuities to drivers. See Docket 1-1. Defendants removed the case to federal court in Massachusetts, and the case was subsequently transferred to this Court pursuant to the *1262 forum selection clause in Uber’s contracts with Plaintiffs. Docket No. 14.

Plaintiffs filed a seven-page amended complaint on February 26, 2015. Docket No. 27. The First Amended Complaint alleges the following causes of action against all Defendants on behalf of a putative class of Uber drivers who operated in Massachusetts: (1) Independent Contractor Misclassification; (2) Violation of the Massachusetts Tips Law; (3)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.