Solid 21, Inc. v. Hublot of America

Good Law
109 F. Supp. 3d 1313·2015 WL 3756490·91 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1940·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79611
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 12, 2015Case No. CV 11-00468 DMG (JCx)California9,232 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Gee, J.

AMENDED ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. # 63]

This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Hublot of America, LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SA, LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton, Inc., and LVMH Watch and Jewelry USA, Inc., on January 3, 2014. [Doc. # 63.] On April 25, 2014, the Court held a hearing on the *1316 Motion. On September 29, 2014, the Court issued an order denying the Motion. [Doc. # 129] On June 12, 2015, the Court granted Defendants’ motion for reconsideration and vacated the September 29, 2014 Order. [Doc. # 152.] The Court hereby issues an Amended Order Re Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

I.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On January 14, 2011, Plaintiff Solid 21, Inc. filed a complaint in this Court asserting claims against Defendants Hublot of America, LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton, Inc., LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton, SA, and LVMH Watch, and Jewelry USA, Inc. [Doe. # 1.] This case is one of 14 related actions filed by Solid 21 in this Court. [Doc. # 10.]

On March 11, 2011, Defendants filed an Answer and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.