Pappion

Pappion v. R-Ranch Property Owners Ass'n

Good Law
110 F. Supp. 3d 1017·2015 WL 2452826·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66808
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 2015No. 2:13-cv-01146-TLN-CMKCalifornia4,415 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nunley, J.

ORDER

Plaintiff Chante C. Pappion (“Plaintiff’) is a wheelchair-bound partial owner at the R-Ranch recreational facility in Siskiyou County. Plaintiff filed the instant action against Defendants R-Ranch Property Owners Association (“POA”), a California Non-Profit Corporation, as well as individual members of the POA Board, Hal Glover, Mark Grenbemer, John Crosby, Rob Bucher, Mark Perry, Michael Horne, and Rick Wever (collectively “Defendants”) under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12182 and California state law, including the Un-ruh Act, Cal. Civ.Code § 51-53, and the California Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 54-54.8 . Plaintiffs Complaint alleges that she has been denied full and equal access to the R-Ranch facilities. The parties’ have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs Partial Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 23-1) is DENIED and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 24-1) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff initiated this case on June 7, 2013, to challenge Defendants’ alleged violations of the ADA, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.