Roy

Roy v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
114 F. Supp. 3d 1030·2015 WL 4275391·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93577
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 2015Case No. CV 12-09012 BRO (FFMx)California9,082 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Reidconnell, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [71]

I. INTRODUCTION

Pending before the Court is a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles (the “County”) and Sheriff Leroy D. Baca. 1 (Dkt. No. 71.) Defendants seek to dismiss Plaintiffs’ third through eighth claims for relief, all of which arise under state law. After considering the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the instant, motion, the Court deems this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument of counsel. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. For. the following reasons, Defendants’, motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs are a group of individuals who were or are currently in the custody of the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department (the “Sheriffs Department”) and who were denied either bail or release on the basis of an immigration hold. Duncan Roy (“Mr. Roy”) is a British citizen who was allegedly detained for eighty-nine days pursuant to an immigration hold and Defendants’ subsequent refusal to allow him to post bail. (Compl. ¶ 9.) Alain Martinez-Perez…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.