Gerritsen
Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Morrow, J.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ . . MOTION . TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST. AMENDED COMPLAINT-
On April 29, 2014, Terry T. Gerritsen filed this action against Katja Motion Pic *1110 ture Corporation (“Katja”), New Line Productions, Inc. (“New Line”), and Warner Brothers Entertainment, Inc. (“WB”) (collectively, “defendants”). 1 On June 20, 2014, defendants filed a motion to dismiss Gerritsen’s complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2 The court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss with leave to amend on January 30, 2015. 3 Gerritsen filed a timely first amended complaint on February 19, 2015, 4 which defendants moved to dismiss on March 9,2015. 5 The same day, defendants filed a request that the court consider certain documents purportedly incorporated by reference in Gerritsen’s first amended complaint. 6 Gerritsen opposes both defendants’ motion and their request that the court consider the allegedly incorporated documents.
Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, the court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. The hearing calendared for June 15, 2015, is therefore vacated, and the…