Marshburn

Marshburn v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America

Good Law
119 F. Supp. 3d 1203·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104736
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 2015Case No. 2:14-cv-00242-CAS (PJWx)California4,504 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Snyder, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE: BENCH TRIAL HELD ON DEFENDANTS ERISA PREEMPTION DEFENSE

I. INTRODUCTION

On December 4, 2018, plaintiff Julie Marshburn, M.D., filed this lawsuit against defendant Unum Life Insurance Company of America (“Unum”) and Does 1 through 10. On January 10, 2014, Unum removed the action to this Court on the basis of diversity and federal question jurisdiction. Dkt. Nos. 1, 8. In brief, the complaint alleges that Unum failed to make disability payments owed to plaintiff under the terms of an insurance policy issued by Unum, having improperly determined that plaintiff was not disabled. See generally Compl. (attached to Dkt. No. 8). Plaintiff alleges claims under California law for breach of contract and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing. Id.

On December 8, 2014, Unum filed a motion seeking summary judgment on the ground that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”), governs plaintiffs claims for long-term disability benefits. Dkt. No. 20. Unum argued that plaintiff was ineligible to convert her ERISA-governed, employer-affiliated group policy to an individual policy governed by state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.