Gonzalez

United States v. Gonzalez

Good Law
119 F. Supp. 3d 1266·2015 WL 4760286·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105665
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 2015CASE NO. 10CR1009-LABCalifornia2,467 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burns, J.

ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION FOR SENTENCING REDUCTION PER USSG AMENDMENT 782 AND 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2)

Preliminary Statement

The parties have filed a Joint Application for Sentencing Reduction in this case pursuant to Amendment 782 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines and the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2). Amendment. 782 lowered the Base Offense Level for most federal drug offenses, including the two offenses of which the defendant, Humberto Gonzalez, was convicted. Another Guidelines Amendment made the reduced sentencing ranges retroactive. See Amendment 788 (amending Guidelines § 1B1.10). Gonzalez stands to benefit from the changes if he is eligible for relief. The parties maintain that he is, but thé Court finds he is not.

Eligibility for Reduced Sentence Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2)

A court must follow two steps in considering , a motion to reduce a sentence under § 3582(c)(2). First, it must determine whether a defendant is eligible for a sentence reduction under the Sentencing Commission’s policy statement in USSG § 1B1.10. Second, it must “consider any applicable § 3553(a) factors and determine whether, in its discretion, the reduction authorized by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.