Luna

Luna v. Shac, LLC

Good Law
122 F. Supp. 3d 936·2015 WL 4941781·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109841
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 2015Case No. 14-cv-00607-HRLCalifornia2,986 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lloyd, J.

*937 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. No.

In February 2014, John Luna brought suit against Shac, LLC, dba Sapphire Gentlemen’s Club, Club Texting, Inc. and Call-Fire, Inc. for violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227 . Shac, the sole remaining defendant, moves for summaiy judgment. Dkt. No. 85. Plaintiff-filed an opposition and Shac filed a reply. Dkt. Nos. 96, 97. In addition, Plaintiff filed two notices of new authority. 1 Dkt. Nos. 98, 101. All parties hávé expressly consented to having all matters proceed before a magistrate judge. A hearing was held on June 23, 2015. Based on the moving and responding papers, as well as the arguments presented at the hearing, the Court grants the motion for summary judgment.

BACKGROUND

Shac operates the Sapphire Gentlemen’s Club in Las Vegas, Nevada. Shac engaged CallFire, a third-party mobile' marketing company, to provide a web-based platform (here, EXTexting.com) for sending promotional text messages to its customers. Andrews Decl., Exh. 1, at 19, 53-54; Exh. 2, at 68.

Sending text messages through EXText-ing.com involved multiple steps. First, an employee of Shac…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.