Real Estate Training International, LLC v. Nick Vertucci Companies, Inc.

Good Law
124 F. Supp. 3d 1005·2015 WL 5072002·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111433
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 2015Case No. SACV 14-0546 AG (DFMx)California788 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Guilford, J.

Proceedings: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL

Before the Court is a motion seeking. to deprive a party of its chosen counsel. These disqualification motions come with a high risk .of improper motivation, *1006 such as eliminating formidable opponents, disrupting, or harassing the adversary, increasing litigation costs, or distracting from the important issues. See Richard Flamm, Lawyer Disqualification: Conflicts and Other Bases § 25.1 (listing various tactical motivations for bringing a disqualification motion). State bar associations have responded to this risk in various Ways, including by deviating from the ABA model rules to further protect' parties against gamesmanship. Under California rules, parties may avoid the disqualification of their lawyers by consenting to their lawyers’ serving as witnesses. When, as here, such consent is given, the analysis should end.

In this case, Plaintiff Real Estate Training International, LLC (“RETI”) asserts various' claims against Defendants The Nick Vertucci Companies, Inc. and Nick Vertucci (“Defendants”) concerning the dissolution of their business relationship. Defendants filed several counterclaims against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.