Couser

Couser v. Comenity Bank

Good Law
125 F. Supp. 3d 1034·2015 WL 5117082·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118061
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 27, 2015Case No. 12cv2484-MMA-BGSCalifornia6,823 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Anello, J.

*1038 ORDER:

AFFIRMING IN PART TENTATIVE RULING

[Doc. No. 85]

GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

[Doc. No. 82]

GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS, AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE INCENTIVE PAYMENT

[Doc. No. 63]

Plaintiff Carrie Couser, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, moves for Final Approval of Class Settlement and for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Incentive Award. See Doc. Nos. 63, 82. The Court held a final approval hearing on the matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e)(2). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion for final approval of the settlement and GRANTS IN PART the motion for attorneys’ fees, costs, and a class representative incentive award.

Background

A. Factual Background

The individually named plaintiff in this action is Carrie Couser (“Plaintiff’), a resident of California.

Defendant Comenity Bank (“Defendant” or “Comenity”) is á leader in the consumer credit lending industry. Comenity is incorporated in and has its principal place of business in Delaware.

Plaintiff brings this action against Defendant for negligent, knowing, and/or willful…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.