Rubenstein

Rubenstein v. Smith

Good Law
132 F. Supp. 3d 1201·2015 WL 5445994·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124632
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 2015Case No. 2:14-cv-09107-ODW (JC)California3,242 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wright, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [34]

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendants David E. Smith, MMB Holdings LLC, and Mojobear Capital LLC (collectively “Defendants”) move to dismiss the Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In the alternative, Defendants move to dismiss the Complaint for failure to join an indispensable party. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 34.)

II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

This is an action to recover short-swing profits under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act. Plaintiff Aaron Ruben-stein, who owns one share of stock in indiePub Entertainment, Inc. (“indiePub”), alleges that Defendants Mojobear Capital LLC (“Mojobear”), MMB Holdings LLC (“MMB”), and David E. Smith profited from short-swing trades of indiePub stock between 2012 and 2013. (Opp’n, Aff. Tau-ber ¶ 2, Ex. A; Compl. ¶¶ 2, 4, 17, 23-24.) Smith is a member of Mojobear. Mojobear, in turn, is the managing member of MMB. (Mot., Decl. Smith ¶ 2.)

On March 9, 2012, MMB entered into a loan agreement with indiePub. (Id. ¶ 3, Ex. A.) The agreement provided that MMB would make future loans to indiePub in exchange for an option or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.