Bresaz

Bresaz v. County of Santa Clara

Good Law
136 F. Supp. 3d 1125·2015 WL 5726470·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134347
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2015Case No. 14-CV-03868-LHKCalifornia7,118 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Koh, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

. Plaintiffs Laurel Bresaz, Donna Hayes, and Steven Marshall (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this action against the County of Santa Clara, Aldo Groba, Kristin Anderson, Julian Quinonez, Mark Carrasco, Paula McAllister, and Does 4-50 (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiffs allege that Defendants violated the. United States Constitution and various federal and state statutes in connection with an incident on December 10,2013, that led to the death of Brandon Marshall (the “Decedent”). Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. See ECF No. 86 (“Mot.”). The Court finds Defendants’ motion suitable for decision .without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-l(b). Accordingly, the Court VACATES the hearing set for October 1, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. In addition, the Court hereby CONTINUES the Case. Management Conference, currently set for October 1, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. to November *1128 18, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court hereby GRANTS in part…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.