Matsumoto-Herrera

Matsumoto-Herrera v. Continental Casualty Co.

Good Law
137 F. Supp. 3d 1170·2015 WL 5769622·98 Fed. R. Serv. 848·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135716
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 2015Case No. 14-cv-03626-VCCalifornia1,072 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chhabria, J.

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER RE THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO.

Re: Dkt. No.

In this state law discrimination case brought under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, Ginger Matsumoto-Herrera contends that Continental Casualty Company passed her over for an ‘Operations Director' job in favor of a younger, non-disabled candidate by the name of Olga Brody. A year after Brody got the Operations Director job, Continental Casualty fired her for poor performance. Matsumoto-Herrera : wishes to use this evidence at trial in support of her age and disability discrimination claims; Continental Casualty seeks to exclude it on relevance grounds.

As Continental Casualty notes, the Seventh Circuit in Cullen v. Olin Corp., 195 F.3d 317, 323-24 (7th Cir.1999) held, in a federal age discrimination case, that it was an abuse of discretion for the district court to admit evidence that a younger employee performed poorly in a position to which the younger employee was hired over the older plaintiff. Cullen held that the younger employee’s ‘unsatisfactory performance months after the [adverse employment action] had no bearing on management’s state of mind at the time the decision to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.