Stabile

Stabile v. Paul Smith Ltd.

Good Law
137 F. Supp. 3d 1173·2015 WL 5897507·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101291
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 2015Case No. CV 14-3749 DMG (SHx)California6,775 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Dollygee, J.

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION [35]

I.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On May 15, 2014, Plaintiff Judy Stabile filed a Complaint against Defendants Paul Smith Limited, Paul Smith Los Angeles, LLC, The Rug Company Limited, and the Rug Company, LTD. (CA) alleging (1) copyright infringement; (2) vicarious copyright infringement; and (3) contributory copyright infringement. [Doc. # 1.]

On May 1, 2015, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment for non-infringement of Stabile’s allegedly copied paintings or, in the alternative, summary adjudication of the facts and conclusions set, forth in Defendants’ [Proposed] Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions, of Law (“MSJ”). [Doc. # 35.] On May 29, 2015, Stabile filed an opposition (“Opp.”). [Doc. # 41.] 1 . On June 12, 2015, Defendants filed a reply (“Reply”). [Doc. # 50.]

II.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

A. The Parties

Judy Stabile is an abstract artist based in Los Angeles, California who has been a professional artist since 1973. -Defendants’ Reply Statement of Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (“Reply SUF”) ¶¶ 17, 88.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.