Stanley

Stanley v. Baca

Good Law
137 F. Supp. 3d 1192·2015 WL 5436938·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123054
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 2015Case No. CV 12-9569-JAK (GJS)California5,778 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kronstadt, J.

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 686 , the Court has reviewed the Petition, all .other documents filed in this action, Respondent’s Motion For Review Of Magistrate Judge’s Order filed on March 5, 2015 (“Motion”) and all related briefing by the parties, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Report. The Court has conducted a de novo review of those matters to which Petitioner has stated Objections.

The Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT 'IS ORDERED that: (1) the Motion is GRANTED; (2) the Magistrate Judge’s Order of February 19, 2015 is VACATED; (3) the Petition is recharacter-ized as one falling under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ; and (4) within thirty (30) days of this Order, Petitioner shall file a response advising how he wishes to proceed, including whether he wishes to proceed solely with his existing double jeopardy claim or have this action stayed while he exhausts any additional claims arising from his intervening conviction.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.