Ridgeway

Ridgeway v. Nabors Completion & Production Services Co.

Good Law
139 F. Supp. 3d 1084·2015 WL 5971545·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140012
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 2015Case No. CV 15-03436 DDP (VBKx)California4,535 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Pregerson, J.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND DISMISS OR STAY

Presently before the Court ax*e Defendants’ Motions to Compel Arbitration. (Dkt. Nos. 26, 28.) Having considered the parties’ submissions and heard oral argument, the Court adopts the following order.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Brandyn Ridgeway (“Ridge-way”) and Tim Smith (“Smith”; collectively, “Plaintiffs”) brought this class action wage and hour employment dispute against their former employer, Defendant Nabors Completion and Production Services, Co. (“Nabors”), as well as unknown Doe defendants. (First Am. Compl. ¶ 1-2 (“FAC”).) Plaintiffs allege Nabors failed to pay prevailing wages on public works, violated California Labor Code sections 203 and 226(a), and violated California Business & Professions Code section 17200. (Id. at 1H7.) Plaintiffs have also alleged a declaratory relief cause of action against Nabors and Defendants City of Long Beach (“Long Beach”) and Tidelands Oil Production Company (“Tidelands”), asking the court to find that the work Plaintiffs did for Nabors was “public work” because Nabors was a subcontractor of Tidelands, who had contract with Long Beach. (Id. at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.