Gossett

Gossett v. CMRE Financial Services

Good Law
142 F. Supp. 3d 1083·2015 WL 6736883·92 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1481·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151350
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 2015Case No. 15cv803 MMA (NLS)California2,524 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Stormes, J.

ORDER DETERMINING JOINT MOTION FOR RESOLUTION OF DISCOVERY DISPUTE NO. 1 AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR FURTHER SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES

Plaintiff George E. Gossett, III filed this class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) alleging that from October 2014 to February 2015, defendant CMRE Financial Services (CMRE) made unsolicited phone calls to his wireless phone in an attempt to collect an alleged debt. Compl. ¶¶12, 14-15. Gossett says he never consented to the calls. Compl. ¶ 12. The calls were placed allegedly via an automatic telephone dialing system (ATDS) and left messages with an artificial or prerecorded voice. Compl. ¶¶ 13,16-17. Gossett asserts he is a member of a nationwide class that received these unsolicited calls. Compl. ¶24. On October 21,2015, Gossett filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint to add new allegations and claims relating to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. [Dkt. No.. 27.] That motion is set for a hearing on November 23,2015. .

The parties presented this court with a discovery dispute regarding CMRE’s responses to Gossett’s first set of interrogatories and requests for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.