Greenfield MHP Associates, L.P. v. Ametek, Inc.

Good Law
145 F. Supp. 3d 1000·2015 WL 7313409·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156805
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 2015CASE NO. 3:15-cv-1525-GPC-BGSCalifornia7,937 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Honcuriel, J.

ORDER:

GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT AMETEK’S MOTION TO DISMISS

ECF No.

GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT SENIOR OPERATION’S MOTION TO DISMISS

[ECF No. 23]

Before the Court are Defendant Ametek, Inc. (“Ametek”) and Defendant Senior Operations, LLC’s (“Senior” or “Senior Operations”) separate Motions to Dismiss. Def. Ametek’s Mot. Dismiss (“Am. Mot.”), ECF No. 24; Def. Senior Operations’ Mot. Dismiss (“Sen. Mot.”), ECF No. 23. The motions have been fully briefed. 1 See Pis.’ *1004 Opp’n Def. Ametek’s Mot.. Dismiss (“Am. Opp.”), ECF No. 28; Reply Pis.’ Opp’n Def. Ametek’s Mot. Dismiss. (“Am. Reply”), ECF No. 32; Pis.’ Opp’n Def. Senior Operations’. Mot. Dismiss (“Sen. Opp.”), ECF No. 29; Reply Pis.’ Opp’n Def. Senior Operations’ Mot. Dismiss (“Sen. Reply”), ECF No. 33.

Upon consideration of the moving papers and the applicable law, and for the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Ametek’s Motion to Dismiss and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Senior Operation’s Motion to Dismiss.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

This case arises out of the dumping of toxic waste by Defendants and their predecessors into a temporary waste storage…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.