Greenfield MHP Associates, L.P. v. Ametek, Inc.
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Honcuriel, J.
ORDER:
GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT AMETEK’S MOTION TO DISMISS
ECF No.
GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT SENIOR OPERATION’S MOTION TO DISMISS
[ECF No. 23]
Before the Court are Defendant Ametek, Inc. (“Ametek”) and Defendant Senior Operations, LLC’s (“Senior” or “Senior Operations”) separate Motions to Dismiss. Def. Ametek’s Mot. Dismiss (“Am. Mot.”), ECF No. 24; Def. Senior Operations’ Mot. Dismiss (“Sen. Mot.”), ECF No. 23. The motions have been fully briefed. 1 See Pis.’ *1004 Opp’n Def. Ametek’s Mot.. Dismiss (“Am. Opp.”), ECF No. 28; Reply Pis.’ Opp’n Def. Ametek’s Mot. Dismiss. (“Am. Reply”), ECF No. 32; Pis.’ Opp’n Def. Senior Operations’. Mot. Dismiss (“Sen. Opp.”), ECF No. 29; Reply Pis.’ Opp’n Def. Senior Operations’ Mot. Dismiss (“Sen. Reply”), ECF No. 33.
Upon consideration of the moving papers and the applicable law, and for the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Ametek’s Motion to Dismiss and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Senior Operation’s Motion to Dismiss.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This case arises out of the dumping of toxic waste by Defendants and their predecessors into a temporary waste storage…