Chow

Swipe & Bite, Inc. v. Chow

Good Law

147 F. Supp. 3d 924·2015 WL 7423244·117 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1504·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158144

United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 23, 2015Case No. 15-cv-03997-JSTCalifornia5,544 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tigar, J.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT TRINH’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Before the Court is Plaintiff Swipe & Bite, Inc.’s motion to remand and Defendant Christopher: Trinh’s motion to dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, the motion to remand is denied and the motion to dismiss is granted in- part and denied in part.

I. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND

A. Background

This is a business tort dispute between Plaintiff Swipe & Bite, Inc. and Defendants William Chow (“Mr.-Chow?), Christopher Trinh (“Mr. Trinh”), Shuk Chow, and Alice Chow that Mr;: Chow removed to this Court on September 1, 2015. ECF No. 1. Swipe & Bite alleges nine causes of action: breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, intentional and tortious interference with contract, intentional and tortious interference with prospective advantage, conspiracy, violation of court order, and declaratory relief. See ECF No. 1-2, Ex. B, First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Swipe & Bite specifically disclaims an allegation of copyright infringement. Id. ¶ 12.

Swipe & Bite, Inc. is a California corporation' that is developing an online and mobile payment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.