Lennear
Lennear v. Diamond Pet Food Processors of California, LLC
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Nimley, J.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL, AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AMEND
This matter is before the Court pursuant to: Defendants Diamond Pet Food Processors of California; LLC, Diamond Pet Food Processors of Ripon, LLC, and' Schell & Kampeter, Inc, d/b/a Diamond Pet Food’s (“Defendants” or “Diamond”) Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Narvell Henry Sr. under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and (6), 12(c), and 56(c) (ECF No. 25);. Defendants’ Motion to Strike Filings on Behalf of Plaintiff Nar-vell Henry, Sr. and to Disqualify Counsel (ÉCF No. 51); and Plaintiffs Leland Len-near (“Lennear”) and Narvell Henry, Sr.’s (“Henry”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (ÉCF No. 61). Plaintiffs have filed Oppositions to Defendants’ motions (ECF' No. 45; ECF No. 60) and Defendants have filed an opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion (ECF No. 68).
The Court has carefully considered the arguments raised in the Parties’ briefing. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is-GRANTED; Defendants’ Motion to Strike Filings on Behalf of Henry…