Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Services Employees International Union

Good Law
147 F. Supp. 3d 1094·2015 WL 7458616·204 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3667·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158097
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 23, 2015Case No.: 14-cv-2553-GPC (RBB)California11,942 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Honcuriel, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

[ECF Nos. 74, 81]

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. (“Prime Healthcare” or “Plaintiff’) brings this civil action against Defendants Service Employees International Union (“SEIU”), Service Employees International Union— *1096 United Healthcare Workers West (“UHW”), Change to Win, CTW Investment Group, Mary Kay Henry, Dave Re-gan, and Tom Woodruff (collectively, “Defendants”) for 1 alleged violations of the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) and the Labor Management and Relations Act (“LMRA”). (ECF No. 74.) Prime Healthcare alleges that these various union-related entities and individuals are engaged in strong-armed, extortionate tactics and other illegal conduct to' enrich themselves through the acquisition of Prime Healthcare’s property. (SAC ¶ 6, ECF No. 73.) Presently before the Court are Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) (ECF No. 74), and Plaintiffs motion for leave to file a Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) (ECF No. 81). The Parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.