Videckis

Videckis v. Pepperdine University

Good Law
150 F. Supp. 3d 1151·2015 WL 8769974·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167672
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 2015Case No. CV 15-00298 DDP (JCx)California5,462 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Pregerson, J.

AMENDED ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY’S MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD, FOURTH, AND FIFTH CAUSES OF ACTION QF THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

[AMENDED AS TO TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR IN ORIGINAL CAPTION ONLY]

Presently before the Court is Defendant Pepperdine University (“Pepperdine”)’s *1154 Motion to Dismiss the Third, Fourth and Fifth Causes of Action of the Third Amended Complaint and Prayer for Prejudgment Interest Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (“MTD”). (Dkt. No. 33.) Having considered the parties’ submissions and heard oral argument, the Court DENIES the'motion and adopts the following order.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs in this case are Haley Videckis (“Videckis”) and Layana White (“White”). Videckis is a former member of Pepper-dine’s women’s basketball team who transferred to Pepperdine from Arizona State University in July 2013. (Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”), Dkt. No: 31, ¶¶ 1, 47.) White is also a former member of Pepper-dine’s women’s basketball team who transferred to Pepperdine from Arizona State University in January 2014. (TAC ¶¶ 2, 47.) Defendant Pepperdine is a university located in California. (Id. ¶ 3.) Pepperdine receives funds from the federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.