In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation

Good Law
154 F. Supp. 3d 918·2015 WL 9489707·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173404
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 2015Master File No. 14-cv-03264-JDCalifornia7,496 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Donato, J.

*921 ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINTS

In these consolidated antitrust class actions, plaintiffs are direct and indirect purchasers of capacitors, a ubiquitous component in electronic devices of all types. The gist of the complaints is that the defendant manufacturers have conspired to fix capacitor prices in the global market.

The Court granted in part and denied in part defendants’ initial motions to dismiss the direct purchaser plaintiffs’ (“DPPs”) and indirect purchaser plaintiffs’ .(“IPPs”) consolidated complaints. Dkt. No. 710. The DPPs and IPPs subsequently amended their complaints in response to the Court’s order, and now before the Court are defendants’ second sets of motions to dismiss the amended complaints. The Court grants the motion to dismiss the IPPs’ non-California state law claims on Article III standing grounds, grants the separate individual motion to dismiss the direct purchaser plaintiffs’ complaint by American Shizuki Corporation, and denies the motions in all other respects.

BACKGROUND

This order addresses what is new and different in the complaints since the prior motion to dismiss order. Dkt. No. -710. On the DPP side, the case now…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.