Aliphcom

Aliphcom v. Fitbit, Inc.

Good Law
154 F. Supp. 3d 933·2015 WL 9489751·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173078
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 2015Case No. 15-cv-02579-HSGCalifornia2,734 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Gilliam, J.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY

Re: Dkt. No.

Before the Court is a motion, filed by Plaintiffs Alipheom D/B/A Jawbone and Bodymedia, Inc. (“Jawbone”), to stay this action pending'resolution of proceedings before the International Trade Commission : (“ITC”). ‘ Having carefully reviewed the parties’ papers and considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS Jawbone’s motion. .

I. BACKGROUND

Jawbone instituted this action on June 10, 2015 against Defendant Fitbit, Inc. (“Fitbit”). Jawbone filed the operative complaint on July 3, 2015, asserting infringement of six piatents. On July 7, 2015, Jawbone filed a complaint in the ITC, alleging infringement of the same six patents under 19 U.S.C. § 1337 .

The ITC instituted the investigation of Jawbone’s claims on August 17, 2015. 80 Fed. Reg. 162 (Aug. 21, 2015). The ITC has set a target date of December 21, 2016, for completion of the ITC investigation, and has set several key interim dates, including a Markman hearing on December 18, 2015, fact and expert discovery deadlines in January and: March 2016, respectively, summary determination motions in March 2016, and initial determinations in August…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.