United States v. Bell
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Orrick, J.
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
Re: Dkt. Nos. 37, 38,
INTRODUCTION
Count Four of the indictment in this case charges defendants Donnie Bell, Dwight Hart, and Antonio Johnson with using a firearm during a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c). The indictment alleges two crime of violence predicates for the section 924(c) charge: assault on a person assisting a federal officer in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111 (Count Two), and robbery of government property in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2112 (Count Three).
Defendants’ motions to dismiss under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b)(3)(B)(v), arguing that the section 924(c) charge fails to state an offense because neither of the alleged crime of violence predicates qualifies as a crime of *910 violence under the definition set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(3), are DENIED. For the reasons discussed below, I find that section 2112 is not a crime of violence under section 924(c)(3), but that section 111 is.
BACKGROUND
On May 7, 2015, Bell, Hart, and Johnson were charged in a common indictment with (1) one count of conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 371 ; (2) one count of assault on a person assisting a federal officer,…