Paiva

Paiva v. Curda

Good Law
162 F. Supp. 3d 1056·2016 WL 540743·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15829
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 2016Case No. CV 15-05018 DDP (ASx)California5,381 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Pregerson, J.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

[Dkt. No. 13]

Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 13.) After considering the parties’ submissions and hearing oral argument, the Court adopts the following Order.

I. BACKGROUND

This immigration case involves a petition by Plaintiff Valter Silva Paiva for the district court to review the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services’s (“USCIS”) denial of Plaintiffs naturalization application. (Compl., dkt. no. 1.)

Plaintiff is a citizen of Brazil and a lawful permanent resident (“LPR”) of the United States. (Id. at Ex. 1.) Plaintiff received his LPR status on September 25, 2008, based on Plaintiffs marriage to a natural-born U.S. citizen, Rachael Paiva, in January 2008. (Id.) Initially, Plaintiffs LPR status was conditional, which means it was subject to review after two years. (Id. at Ex. 5.) Plaintiffs LPR conditions were lifted on September 20, 2010. (Id.)

After three years of marriage to the same U.S. citizen and three years of LPR status, Plaintiff applied for U.S. citizenship naturalization by filing his N-400,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.