Anderson
Anderson v. City of San Francisco
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Ryu, J.
ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND; DENYING MOTION TO SEAL
Re: Dkt. Nos. 44, 67,
This action is an employment dispute between Plaintiff Lawanda Anderson and her employer, Defendant City and County of San Francisco (“CCSF”). Plaintiff asserts five claims for relief: federal and state claims for race discrimination and retaliation pursuant to Title VII and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, (“FEHA”), and a FEHA claim for failure to prevent discrimination. Before the court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment or partial summary judgment. [“MSJ,” Docket No. 44.] The court held a hearing on December 10, 2015. For *1003 the reasons stated below, the MSJ is granted in part.
On December 21, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. [Docket 77.] This matter is suitable for determination without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-l(b). For the reasons stated below, this motion is denied.
Plaintiffs motion to file under seal the Declaration of Kevin Brunner and all attached exhibits [Docket No. 67] is denied for the reasons stated below.