Perez

Perez v. City National Corp.

Good Law
176 F. Supp. 3d 945·2016 WL 1397872·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49988
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 5, 2016CV 15-03084 TJH (JCx)California1,658 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hatter, J.

Order

The Court has considered Plaintiff Secretary of Labor Thomas E. Perez’s [hereafter “the Secretary”] motion for partial summary judgment, together with the moving and opposing papers.

The Secretary claims that City National Corporation, various City'National subsidiaries, and various individual employees, acting as fiduciaries, engaged in self-dealing when City National Corporation, or its subsidiaries, received compensation from the City National Corporation Profit Sharing Plan [hereafter “the Plan”] when they were only entitled'to reimbursement for limited, verifiable direct expenses pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Securities Act of 1974 [“ERISA”]. 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 -1191c.

The Secretary moves for partial summary judgment against City National Corporation, City National Bank, and the Plan’s Benefit Committee members Ma-rianna Lamutt, Christopher Carey, Michael Cahill, Michael Nunnelee, Richard Byrd, Vernon Kozlen, and Kate Dwyer [collectively hereafter “City National”] on the following ERISA claims: (1) Violation of the fiduciary requirements to act prudently and for the exclusive purpose of providing benefits to Plan participants and beneficiaries, pursuant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.