Oscar Manuel Carrillo-Rangel, Aka: Oscar Carrillo-Rangel v. United States

Good Law
103 F.3d 137·1996 WL 717118·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 36017
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 199696-55620California296 words

Opinion

Opinion

103 F.3d 137 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Oscar Manuel CARRILLO-RANGEL, aka: Oscar Carrillo-Rangel, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 96-55620. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 2, 1996. * Decided Dec. 06, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Oscar Carrillo-Rangel, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) for the return of property administratively forfeited by the government in connection with Carrillo-Rangel's 1991 prosecution for narcotics offenses. Carrillo-Rangel asserts that the administrative forfeiture was invalid because he did not receive the requisite notice pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881 (a) and 21 C.F.R. § 1316.77 . The government concedes that remand is appropriate because on the record before the district court, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.