Allen v. Lewis

Good Law
103 F.3d 137·1996 WL 713035·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 36022
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 199696-15808California448 words

Opinion

Opinion

103 F.3d 137 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Norman Harold ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel LEWIS, Director of ADOC, individually and official capacities; F. Fehey, Sgt., official and individual capacity; J.C. Keeney, Assistant Director ADOC, official and individual capacities, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-15808. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 2, 1996. * Decided Dec. 06, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arizona state prisoner Norman Harold Allen appeals pro se the district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of his action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , alleging prison officials violated his due process rights when they entered erroneous information about him in the prison computer system. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 To state a cognizable due process claim under section 1983, an inmate must demonstrate that the alleged unlawful…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.