Dennis Chancler v. Jackson County David W. Freyer Robert M. Bate

103 F.3d 137 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dennis CHANCLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACKSON COUNTY; David W. Freyer; Robert M. Bate, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-36228. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 2, 1996. * Decided Dec. 5, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dennis Chancler appeals the district court's summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants terminated his work-release privileges without a hearing in violation of the Due Process Clause. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1059 (9th Cir.1991), and we reverse and remand. 3 Chancler contends that the termination of his work-release privileges without a hearing violates his right to due process. Chancler was convicted of driving while under the influence of intoxicants and sentenced to twelve months probation and…