Carlson v. San Mateo County

103 F.3d 137 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Joette Baross CARLSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAN MATEO COUNTY, Leonard Cardoza, John Wells, Donald O'Keefe, Ken Jones, Norman Solari, Sequoia Hospital District, Gary Farnham, M.D., Gerald Bausek, M.D., David Jacoby, M.D., and Does 1 through 25, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-17426. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1996. * Decided Dec. 09, 1996. Before: CHOY, REAVLEY ** and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Joette Carlson sued San Mateo County, certain county officials and three defendants the parties refer to as the "Hospital Defendants," alleging causes of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law. The Hospital Defendants are the Sequoia Hospital District, Dr. Gerald Bausek and Dr. Gary Farnham. Carlson appeals summary judgments entered in favor of the Hospital Defendants, which were entered as final judgments under FED.R.CIV.P. 54(b). We affirm. BACKGROUND 3 At the…