Arshal v. Dalton

103 F.3d 137 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. George ARSHAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John H. DALTON, Secretary of the Navy; Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States; Joseph A. Hill, Attorney, Department of Justice; Frank G. Nieman, Attorney, Department of Navy; Charles D.B. Curry, Attorney, Department of Navy, Defendants-Appellees, and Francis C. Browne, Administrative Judge in the former United States Court of Claims; the Law Clerk of said Administrative Judge in the period including Feb. 7-8, 1979; Daniel M. Friedman, Chief Judge of the former Court of Claims; and Oscar H. Davis, Philip Nichols Jr., Shiro Kashiwa, Robert L. Kunzig, Marion T. Bennett, and Edward S. Smith, Judges of the former Court of Claims, Defendants. No. 96-35400. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 2, 1996. * Decided Dec. 06, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 George Arshal appeals pro se the district court's…