Alejandro

Alejandro v. ST Micro Electronics, Inc.

Good Law
178 F. Supp. 3d 850·2016 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 111·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47964
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 2016Case No. 15-CV-01385-LHKCalifornia7,054 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Koh, J.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 44-

Defendant STMicroelectronics, Inc. has filed a motion for summary judgment on all of Plaintiff Jesse Alejandro’s claims. ECF No. 44-4 (“Mot.”). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-l(b), the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the motion hearing and case management conference set for April 14, 2016. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

Below, the Court relies primarily upon Plaintiffs deposition, Plaintiffs declaration, and the exhibits to Plaintiffs deposition and declaration to summarize the undisputed facts regarding Plaintiffs employment with Defendant.

Defendant is a corporation incorporated in Delaware and with its principal place of business in Texas. ECF No. 2, Ex. A, ¶¶ 6-7. Plaintiff was employed by Defendant as a sales engineer in Santa Clara, California from September 2012 until April 2014. Deck of Jesse Alejandro (“Alejandro Deck”), ECF No. 47-3, ¶¶1-2; Alejandro Depo., Exhs. Vok I, ECF No. 44-8.

During the time Plaintiff worked for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.