Virgil Antonov, Costanta Antonov, and Alexander Antonov v. County of Los Angeles Department of Public Social Services

103 F.3d 137 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Virgil ANTONOV, Costanta Antonov, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Alexander Antonov, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-56681. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 18, 1996. * Decided Nov. 20, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Virgil Antonov, his wife Costanta, and their minor child, Alexander, appeal pro se the district court's dismissal for lack of prosecution of their civil rights action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review for abuse of discretion the district court's dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1423 (9th Cir.1986). 4 The district court should weigh several factors when determining whether to dismiss a case for lack of prosecution: "(1) the public's…