Boyd v. Crawford
Opinion
Opinion
103 F.3d 137 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Danny BOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Terry CRAWFORD, Detective, Oregon State Police; Terry Bekkedahl, Criminalist, Oregon State Police, Defendants, and Gary Fisher, Detective, City of Salem Police Department, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-35813. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 2, 1996. * Decided Dec. 5, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Danny Boyd, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in Boyd's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in which Boyd alleged that defendants violated several of his constitutional rights in connection with a homicide investigation at the Oregon State Penitentiary. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. 3 Appellees contend that this court lacks jurisdiction over Boyd's appeal. We agree. Boyd's notice of appeal is deemed filed on August 2, 1995, when Boyd delivered it to…