Borovac v. Washoe County

Good Law
103 F.3d 137·1996 WL 673861·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 36038
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 20, 199695-17160California324 words

Opinion

Opinion

103 F.3d 137 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul BOROVAC, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASHOE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; Don Bissett, individually and in his official capacity as Comptroller for Washoe County, Estella Henry, individually and in her official capacity as Senior Account Clerk for Washoe County Office of Comptroller; Carolyn Stoffel, Senior Account Clerk for Washoe County Office of Comptroller; Katherine L. Garcia, individually and in her official capacity as Chief Deputy Comptroller of Washoe County, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-17160. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 8, 1996. Decided Nov. 20, 1996. Before: RONEY, * BEEZER, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Paul Borovac appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Washoe County, on five claims arising from his termination: 1) sex discrimination; 2) retaliatory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.