Benjamin-Sohal

103 F.3d 137 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jasmine BENJAMIN-SOHAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PACIFIC BELL; Michael Ratener, Dr.; Irene Sardanis, Dr.; Communication Workers of America--Local 9415; Molly Wetzel; Bella Vista Crime Watch Group, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-17200. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 2, 1996. * Decided Dec. 5, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jasmine Benjamin-Sohal appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim in her action against Pacific Bell, Dr. Ratener, Dr. Sardanis, and the Communications Workers of America, Local 9415 ("Local 9415"). Benjamin-Sohal sought damages for several causes of action 1 including Local 9415's alleged breach of its duty of fair representation pursuant to § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act ( 29 U.S.C. § 185 ). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo a…