Basconcillo v. I.N.S.

103 F.3d 137 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Diosdado Y. BASCONCILLO, II, Diosdado Santos Basconcillo, III, Barby Lee Basconcillo, III, and Angelina Basconcillo, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70500. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 7, 1996. * Decided Nov. 20, 1996. Petition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, Nos. Akc-agt-ivz, Aff-mca-wtv, Akd-cct-mcg and Ajh-nfj-jgo. B.I.A. REVIEW DENIED. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, REAVLEY ** and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Diosdado Basconcillo, his wife and two children sought political asylum and the withholding of deportation by the INS. An immigration judge conducted an evidentiary hearing on the requests and rejected them. On administrative appeal, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) conducted an independent review of the record and affirmed the immigration judge's order. We affirm the decision of…