Durham v. Roberts

Good Law
103 F.3d 138·1996 WL 713463·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 36049
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 199695-35559California2,484 words

Opinion

Opinion

103 F.3d 138 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. David Raymond DURHAM, Richard Ervin Phelps, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Barbara ROBERTS, Governor of State of Oregon; James Muranaka, Assistant Superintendent Program Services at Oregon State Correctional Institution; Patrick Tacy, Academic Manager Oregon State Correctional Institution; Kelly Lawrence, Librarian Oregon State Correctional Institution; Gary Fouch, Officer Oregon State Correctional Institution; Sally L. Avera, Public Defender Oregon State Correctional Institution Review Committee Law Library; Lynn Rosik, Assistant Attorney General Oregon State Correctional Institution Review Committee Law Library, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35559. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 8, 1996. Decided Dec. 06, 1996. 1 Before: FLETCHER and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges, and KING, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 David R. Durham and Richard E. Phelps, inmates at the Oregon State…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.