Munoz

Munoz v. InGenesis STGI Partners, LLC

Good Law
182 F. Supp. 3d 1097·2016 WL 1620367·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56335
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 2016Case No.: 14cv1547-MMA (BLM)California6,013 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Honanello, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Vanessa Munoz alleges Defendants InGenesis, Inc. (“InGenesis”), In-Genesis STGi Partners, LLC (the Joint Venture or “JV”) and STG International, Inc. (“STGi”) unlawfully: (1) required her to use Paid Time Off.while on military leave (Count I); (2) terminated her- be *1100 cause she took military leave (Count II); and (3) failed to reemploy her after she returned from military leave (Counts III and IV). Defendants move for summary judgment as to all of Plaintiffs claims. See Doc. Nos. 162, 163. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motions as to Count I, and DENIES Defendants’ motions as to Counts II, III, and IV.

Background

Plaintiff is a U.S. Navy veteran. She served on active duty as a hospital corpsman from 2007 until 2009, when she was honorably discharged from active duty. Since then she has continued to serve in the U.S. Navy Reserves.

Defendant InGenesis is a human resources company headquartered in San Antonio Texas. Defendant STGi is a “workforce solutions company” with a West Coast regional office in San Diego, California. In June 2011, InGenesis and STGi formed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.