Steven Derrick Irvin v. Nadim Khoury, Md Kenneth Shepard, Md

103 F.3d 138 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Steven Derrick IRVIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nadim KHOURY, MD; Kenneth Shepard, MD, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-15130. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 2, 1996. * Decided Dec. 05, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Steven Irvin, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison officials in Irvin's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that he received inadequate medical treatment for a cyst on his finger and a lesion on his neck. The district court determined that Irvin's complaint, which only sought injunctive relief, was moot because Irvin received medical treatment for his finger and neck while the complaint was pending. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we vacate and remand. 3 We review de novo a district court's grant of summary judgment. McGuckin v. Smith,…