Makis A. Havadjias, and Haralambos Havadjias v. Vanguard Insurance Company, Makis A. Havadjias, and Haralambos Havadjias v. Vanguard Insurance Company, Makis A. Havadjias Haralambos Havadjias v. Vanguard Insurance Company

Good Law
103 F.3d 138·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 36050
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 199694-56451California1,665 words

Opinion

Opinion

103 F.3d 138 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Makis A. HAVADJIAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Haralambos Havadjias, Plaintiff, v. VANGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Makis A. HAVADJIAS, Plaintiff, and Haralambos Havadjias, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VANGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Makis A. HAVADJIAS; Haralambos Havadjias, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. VANGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 94-56451, 94-56461 and 94-56640. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 2, 1996. * Decided Dec. 05, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In consolidated appeal No. 94-56451, Makis A. Havadjias appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendant Vanguard Insurance Company ("Vanguard") in an independent action to set aside a prior judgment brought by Makis and Haralambos Havadjias ("the Havadjiases"). In consolidated appeal No. 94-56461, Haralambos Havadjias…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.