Hirano v. Young

103 F.3d 138 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Douglas A. HIRANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pauline YOUNG; Kelly Knowles; Carol Roldan; Dan Lake; Frances Watkins; Robbie Robinson; Pete Morocco; Eric Penarosa; John Smythe; Elwood Reynolds; State of Hawaii, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-15660. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 2, 1996. * Decided Dec. 05, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Douglas Hirano, a Hawaii state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Hirano alleges that prison officials: (1) subjected him to an unreasonable urinalysis test in violation of the Fourth Amendment, (2) violated his due process rights by conducting a procedurally-flawed disciplinary hearing, and (3) imposed cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment by placing him in disciplinary segregation for…