Nisius v. Lewis

Good Law
103 F.3d 139·1996 WL 713989·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 36417
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 199696-15809California952 words

Opinion

Opinion

103 F.3d 139 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Melvin Eugene NISIUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel LEWIS; James P. McFadden; D. Granillo, Sergeant at Arizona State Prison Complex-Eyman; Lu Funk, CPO II at SMU; Tommy Clark, CSO at Arizona State Prison Complex-Eyman; Sue Maberry, CSO at Arizona State Prison Complex-Eyman; Duran, CSO at Arizona State Prison Complex-Eyman; Roger Crist, Senior Warden at Arizona State Prison Complex-Florence; James Upchurch, Complex Warden at Arizona State Prison Complex-Florence; William Rhode, Deputy Warden at Arizona State Prison Complex-Florence-Central Unit; Stan W. Czerniak, Assistant Deputy Warden at Arizona State Prison Complex-Florence-Central Unit; M. Errol Grant, Senior Chaplain at Arizona State Prison Complex-Florence; W.A. Haro, CPO II at Arizona State Prison Complex-Florence-Central Unit, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-15809. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 2, 1996. * Decided Dec. 06,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.