Charles Dale Larson v. Tana Wood

103 F.3d 139 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles Dale LARSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tana WOOD, Respondent-Appellee. No. 95-36023. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 2, 1996. * Decided Dec. 5, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Washington state prisoner Charles Dale Larson appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. Larson contends that: (1) the police did not have probable cause to search his apartment; (2) he was denied a free transcript; (3) he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial and on appeal; (4) he was erroneously denied a sentencing hearing; (5) a pro tem judge was improperly appointed to serve as his defense counsel; (6) he erroneously received an exceptional sentence; (7) bail jumping charges against him should have been dismissed; (8) hearsay evidence was improperly admitted at his trial; and (9) the trial…