King

King v. National General Insurance Co.

Good Law
186 F. Supp. 3d 1062·2016 WL 2851861·2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64349
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 2016Case No. 15-cv-00313-DMRCalifornia6,367 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Ryu, J.

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS CORRECTED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO STRIKE

- Qualified California drivers are entitled to purchase “Good Driver Discount” auto insurance policies. Plaintiffs Edd King, Diedre King, Elmo Sheen, and Sheila Lee allege that they are qualified “Good Drivers.” Plaintiffs allege that Defendants National General Insurance Company (“NGIC”), National' General Assurance Company (“NGAC”), Integon National Insurance Company (“Integon National”), Integon Preferred Insurance Company (“Integon Preferred”),' MIC General Insurance Corporation (“MIC”), Personal Express Insurance Company (“Personal Express”), and Sequoia Insurance Company *1064 (“Sequoia”) share common ownership, management or control, and therefore belong to the same “control group.” Plaintiffs bring this putative class action alleging that Defendants failed to cross-offer to Plaintiffs and putative class members the lowest Good Driver rates available within Defendants’ control group, as required by California law.

Defendants previously moved to dismiss the complaint and to strike certain allegations. The court held that Plaintiffs had sufficiently alleged injury-in-fact for Article III…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.