Long v. County of Los Angeles

103 F.3d 139 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Phillip LONG; Mary Long; Elizabeth Long, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; Sherman Block, Sheriff; A.E. Garcia; Unknown California; Unknown Price; J. Jones; Unknown Coleman, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-56047. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 18, 1996. * Decided Nov. 20, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Phillip and Mary Long appeal pro se the district court's summary judgment dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the County of Los Angeles, Sheriff Sherman Block, and several County of Los Angeles sheriff's deputies violated their constitutional rights. The Longs alleged that their constitutional rights were violated on October 27, 1993, when they were arrested for felony child endangerment and for obstructing, delaying and resisting the execution of the deputies' duties. 1 We review de novo the…