May v. Esplin

103 F.3d 139 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. David L. MAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rick ESPLIN * , Patrolman Ontario Police Department; Dave Atnip, Detective Ontario Police Department; Ronald K. Mallea, Sheriff Malheur County OR, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-36029. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 2, 1996. ** Decided Dec. 05, 1996. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 David L. May, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and dismissing his defamation claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . After a de novo review of the record, see Jesinger v. Nevada Fed. Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir.1994), we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion and order filed on September 20, 1995. 1 AFFIRMED. 2 * The Clerk of the Court shall enter this correction…