Kulas v. Haley

103 F.3d 139 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Theodore C. KULAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lt. HALEY; Officer Aguirre; Officer Haight; Officer Arbalo, Sgt. Herrington, Officer Ketchum, Clarence Dupnik, Officer Lawless, Pima County Sheriff's Department, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-17008. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 18, 1996. * Decided Nov. 20, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Theodore C. Kulas, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We vacate and remand for further proceedings. Before entering summary judgment, district courts must advise pro se prisoners of the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir.1988). A review of the district court record reveals that the district court…